3D Printers

The World's Sexiest 3D Printer (Part 2)

Rapide3D 3D Printer
Comments (25)
  1. RichRap says:

    “You aren’t reading this for a new installment of your favourite ongoing 3D printing erotica. Um. Are you?” *Hangs head… initially yes, that’s why I clicked on it.

    Had to look up ‘Dionysian’ thanks for that.

    Form 1 – saw one in the ‘flesh’ for the first time at the 3D printshow. It was less dainty than I expected, and along with the many brittle and snapped printed models on show, I found myself underwhelmed with it, and glad I didn’t opt for one after all. 6/10

    BeTheFirst – Really like this printer. Quite burlesque and revealing whilst retaining respect and authority. This one will go a long way. 7/10

    Rapide1 – what can I say apart from the Delorian didn’t actually turn me on… 5/10

    I’m going to wait for her sister the Rapide S – 9/10 (for looks, time will tell on the spec)

    The Ultimaker 2 = Cinderella (At the grand ball – not on her knees in the kitchen). 8/10

    You mentioned the CubeX ! – I didn’t know you liked that sort of thing! disgusting…

    Cracking instalment as always and just remember people even if it looks like a ferrari but takes four hours to print out a small plastic frog, that’s not foreplay, it’s just going to be yet another anti-climax.

    Can’t believe you didn’t mention BotObjects… or is that the odd cousin we don’t talk about any more.

    Always wanted to ask – what IS your strangest Pizza? – I’m not asking you out on a date or anything like that! just wondered.

    Rich 😉

    1. Kevin Quigley says:

      Interesting comments on the Form1 Richard. I’ve yet to see one…they seem to be avoiding me! The brittle materials are common even now with all resin processes…I’ve sat in meetings watching customers snapping a £1000 SLA! Having said that we had some very nice SLA clear parts done today that are as tough as old boots.

      My rule of thumb on 3D printers is it needs to be purchasable now, not “for delivery in 6 to 8 weeks” or ” available on Kickstarter/ etc” with that factor in place the list above reduces…including Shane’s Mrs.

      Returning to which…fancy case, basic internals. Lot of money for a single extruder, not huge build area, dubious looking internals. The fact that they are offering a RepRap as a reward implies all this thing is, is a Rep Rap in a fancy case…the footballers wag of 3D Printing? Sorry Shane.

      As for the bot? Well, has anyone anywhere (resellers included) actually seen a production unit yet?

      1. RichRap says:

        The Form 1 is simply not useful (for me), I’m sure it’s perfect for ring making, models, some concept design work and things that do not require a lot of assembly with screws or other fixings. I simply don’t see how these particular resin material can be used for many functional prototypes I would want to design and make, but I guess that’s always been the same issue with SLA.

        It was also using a lot of resin for support material, much more than I had expected to support small objects.

        Formlabs just announced white resin, I don’t really see the point if it’s exactly as brittle as the grey and natural, that’s where the Objet technology wins as they do have ABS-like, flexible and many others.

        I’m sure Formlabs have many very happy customers, so it may be perfect for your needs, the tool-chain software was very impressive.

        Calling everything else on the market a ‘RepRap’ is unfair to the RepRap project.

        RepRap = self replicating machine
        Anything else that does not ‘print/produce’ some/many of it’s own parts = Home 3D printer.

        1. Kevin Quigley says:

          To be honest I’ve heard conflicting reports on the Form1 – mainly negative it has to be said, from people who either have one or know someone with one. I’m also puzzled that they have no UK distribution in place yet attend shows in the UK – except the one that most of their customer base attend -TCT. All of which leads me to assume they are looking for the quick buck and after a sell off to a bigger company. On paper it is an ideal machine for 50% of our work (small medical product development jobs), but until I can see some actual parts and get some parts sampled it is a no go.

          The support issues are common to SLA – in fact this is something you need to be very aware of when ordering SLA parts as sometimes the supports are in areas that are very very difficult to get at and can affect the part function. Again this is a big advantage to “Real” FDM from Stratasys with dissolvable supports, and of course all the powder based systems. Objet supports have to be jetwashed off, or at least loosened in water so you do occasionally get issues with waxy like support material clogging up internal pockets/voids.

          My comment about Rep-Rap was not meant to be derogatory. It is more of a recognition that everything else on the market is dervived from the Rep-Rap project in one form or another – had it not been for Rep-Rap we would not have all these hundreds of different types of printers on the market or in crowd funded sites now.

          I suspect that is exactly what is inside the Rapide 1 – a commercialised Rep-Rap design. Still, I’m not sure Shane will be seeing much of his Mrs any time soon…she is not getting much traction in the funding game so far…

      2. Shane Taylor says:

        I agree regarding the superficial being a poor consideration completely Mr. K – 🙂 I kept trying to make a point out of looks not being important through the last and this article – couldn’t have written the article without rounding up some promisingly practical printers although it may get lost in the message.

        I’m starting to rethink articles now that 3DPI is doing so well, offer up some alternatives with each 3D printer covered, try and explain the basics whilst covering the bits of interest for those in the know.

        A bewildering thought: 3DPI now has half as many Facebook Likes as there are 3D printers in the world.

        Taking it, purely speculatively, that surely less than half of readers go to the effort of adding a social media Like, that pretty much equates to all the world’s 3D printer owners and makers reading 3DPI. Doubtless those samples do not cross over anything like as directly as that, but the onus is that there are now so many readers of so many interest types and experience levels that I start to ask myself constantly ‘how can I provide value to as many different people as possible with this article.’

        All thoughts on that most welcome.

        I think 3DPI could provide a lot of additional value if makers sent in their new 3D printers for review for example. Getting that to work may be quite difficult logistically. Pirate 3D sold that as a must what with their specs appearing only after a LOT of money had been channelled into their crowd-funding. Still, for $347 it was fine.

        I’m waffling now…

        1. Kevin Quigley says:

          Just send the printers to me for testing. We’ll sort the wheat from the chaffe.

          1. Shane Taylor says:

            Or send you to the 3D printers. Mediabistro have unfathomable riches, be a pity to not utilise them.

          2. Kevin Quigley says:

            This is where most media testers go wrong. The only valid test IMHO is one you do in your premises in your own time. If you test anything in the environment a manufacturer provides it is very easy to set it up to look great, especially if you are building parts they provide ( the twirly vase syndrome). CAD software is even worse in thus respect, with demo pieces run by experts.

          3. Shane Taylor says:

            I’m joking!

            Although not about the overall testing part. It would surely very much have to be makers sending their printers to us, perhaps by proximity to author to aid their shipping / transportation costs.

            This is for none-public facing discussion I’m thinking: what is your email Kev please, I’ve always used Twitter chatting to you before.

          4. Kevin Quigley says:

            I’ll DM you on Twitter

    2. Shane Taylor says:

      It was strange, I was going to be a lot more expansive with the beautiful 3DP’s as there are just so very many to mention. I became aware that I was already writing quite a bit so wound it up at three.

      CubeX, hmm, well, she’s pretty. I’m an opensource man by preference as you know, but in terms of pure looks, she’s not at all bad?

      BotObjects, I find myself shaking my head aevery time I type that further to the TCT investigation topping off all the doubts we had. Hope to see her sometime though, best wishes to all makers and manufacturers at the end of the day – although those seeking to benefit people, not profits, will always get my love foremost.

      Strangest pizza, probably chicken roast. Although 3D printed space pizza may be on the distant horizon!

      S

      1. RichRap says:

        More expansive and detailed please, 3DPI needs more articles, real reviews and observations. It’s fine reading news and press releases but it’s really only these sort of posts that will hold any significant value over all the many, many news feeds and sites out there.

        It also gets the discussions going…

        I would be interested to know how many views/month you are getting on these articles v news stories. For a small comparison I’m at 150,000/month on my personal Blog and some posts are over 1M views for some reason, things are on an exponential rise at the moment.

        The most important thing is that it’s not about numbers or facebook likes, but communicating with your specific ‘tribe’, that’s where people’s own views outweigh company PR and what passes for ‘news’

        Roast Chicken’s not that odd, I was expecting Chocolate and Parsnip or something 🙂

        You may need to get a forum going at this rate.

  2. Guest says:

    Shane, I hope for the next contest Zinter Pro is not overlooked! We’ll see you in the New Year where we’ll be back for not only beauty queen but the serious awards too!! http://www.zinter.com

  3. Shane Taylor says:

    The Zinter is beautiful. The podium was just too small to fit more prize winners on I’m afraid 😉 The best of luck for the awards, and doubtless the Zinter will show up at 3DPI in the very near future…

  4. Cam Macduff says:

    Next time include the Robox on Kickstarter. Nice looking, similar materials to the Rapide plus dual heads. Similar build area too.

    1. Shane Taylor says:

      Hmm. Should we do a readers voed version? I like the cut of your jib Cam…

      1. Cam Macduff says:

        Yea, Peoples Choice could be nice actually. There’s so much out there now and they’re coming thick and fast.

        1. Shane Taylor says:

          We love feedback Cam, so, sure thing. I’ll write an article asking for votes for a Christmas article. Should be fun, and informative….

  5. Cam Macduff says:

    I’d also note re: as a Form1 owner, it’s worked well for me especially with the new software.
    Better support system and smaller points of contact. But yes, you do have to do quite a bit of filing off of the ragged bits left behind for a clean finish.
    Haven’t found the clear resin I’m using overtly brittle, but then, this is the first 3D printer I’ve owned so I can’t compare. Tensile strength seems good and some small long and thin parts you can physically twist about 30º without them snapping.

    1. Kevin Quigley says:

      How are you finding part accuracy and repeatability?

      1. Cam Macduff says:

        For me fine. But it’s definitely not up to lab standards. Try printing a few circles and you’ll soon see. That said, it keeps getting better with each new version of the software. So they’ve managed to improve accuracy.
        However it also depends on how old or fogged up your resin tank is, so you need to be aware of where in the tank you’re printing your objects and not print them in the same spot all the time so as to fog the layer of clear silicone. I’ve only just ordered a new tank and the last one has lasted 9mnths.

  6. Shane Taylor says:

    James! I just noted that you are part of the Iron Core team. Zinter article written and pending, stay posted – although beware I have an anti-celebrity ethos, no bonus points for Made In Chelsea 😉 The printer looks great however.

    1. James Marchant says:

      Hi Shane, I am indeed part of the ION Core team! 🙂 Now now don’t judge a book by its cover because we’re a novel! You’ll have to give us a chance to make some announcements before you write too much about us. That will come thick and fast after Christmas!

      1. Shane Taylor says:

        Sure thing. The article is very much based upon looks, a deeper analysis to certainly come later. You’ll see…

  7. Mike Molitch-Hou says:

    I thought the title “World’s Sexist 3D Printer” was intentional.

Leave a Reply