3D Printers

USPS Delivers 3DP? The American Postal Colossus Makes Plans To Push The RePrint Button…

USPS 3d printing
Comments (2)
  1. lairdp says:

    Nice article!

    One small correction, though. The USPS is not “billions of dollars in debt because you’re no longer government-funded” – The USPS has been entirely self-funded since 1982, and runs roughly break-even. It’s billions of dollars in debt because, back when the USPS was highly profitable, Congress took about $75 billion from the USPS into the general fund (via the “pre-payment” trick) to make the general fund’s deficits look smaller, counting on the USPS’ profitability to pay off Congress’ debt. But since email has replaced personal mail, the USPS’ profits are down to break-even, and they can’t pay off the last part of Congress’ $75 billion. And Congress won’t let them make any changes to save money, because no town wants their post office closed, even if it’s under-used. So the problem is that the USPS is not government funded, but it has to spend its money to pay off unrelated government debts, and has to do whatever Congress wants. Which would all be fine, if Congress paid for it. But they’re not…

  2. PrintMaster says:

    I freely admit it. I’m confused. I spent most of this column reading cute, punny-but-devoid-of-substance rhetoric about the USPS’s strengths and failings, the rise of 3D printing as a disruptive force, the potential for the Service to make beaucoup bucks, and its history (yes, it was nice to hear yet again that Ben Franklin was the *very first* Postmaster General, not that this fact is germaine to this post), but never really got any closer to what the Postal Service is actually planning on doing here. The first four paragraphs are totally introductory. Any newspaper editor will tell you to write ONE introductory paragraph and then get to the meat.

    I was easily two-thirds of the way through the article before any concrete mention was made of WHAT sort of service the USPS will provide, and even then, it was nebulous at best. I mean (and I’m probably missing something here), does the USPS think that because more people are going to make use of 3D printing-produced goods, and ship 3D items shorter distances from their place of manufacture, that more carrier business will be generated for the USPS? That was a given, right? How else would you get something from across town to your door? Hire a messenger? This doesn’t sound like a blockbuster idea for new profits.

    Also they sort of mention in passing that they might have 3D printers on-site, to partner with manufacturers. What for? If trends continue, 3D printing will get so cheap that almost anyone can afford a printer. And if you can’t afford it, your neighbor probably can.

    My guess is that you get paid by the word, and your editor (if you have one) is either too intimidated by your literary prowess or too overburdened (or bored) to actually read your work. My gut feeling is that you’re confusing a press release for a blog. I’m also guessing that after my first cup of coffee my outlook may change entirely and this will all become crystal clear.

    I’ll keep my fingers crossed on that last one.

Leave a Reply