3D Printers

MatterFab Launches Affordable 3D Metal Printing

matterfab 3D metal printer logo
Comments (8)
  1. Cody Limbaugh says:

    Correction: the article says $120/lb but the interview said $120/kg. 1kg=2.2lb so it’s less than half the cost as the article mentioned.

    1. Mike Molitch-Hou says:

      Oops! My mistake. Thanks so much for catching that!

  2. Brad Arnold says:

    “If industrial 3D metal printers don’t always meet the standards of repeatability and precision desired by large companies in those fields, a low price may not necessarily cut it.”

    This misses the point – it is the prototype market that ought to be targeted. It is hard to believe that it could be quickly adapted to commercial mass production (or that any manufacturer would want to take the risk with a production line).

    1. Bradley Chapman says:

      Agreed. However, adoption rate will follow the prosumer spending threshold, proportional to the value proposition. If prototyping in metal (as opposed to the much cheaper plastic alternative) means printing cast, or prototyping cast for molding then resolution detail will be more important than the price point.

      1. Mike K says:

        where will the price of the printer itself fall, that is the real question

        1. Bradley Chapman says:

          That’s a variable, for sure. Price point, itself, has many subcomponents, though. How much is the material (powder)? How much is the post processing material? What is the rate of perfect prints (1/5, 3/5)? How much of the ‘unused’ material is recyclable?

    2. martin doten says:

      when it comes to quality or volume of products that satisfies the peoples or the markets needs the people or the market will make the decision on what is best for them, especially since they will be creating and buying each others products with their own money. the people are creating the market all the way from the creation of the products to the sale and buying of the products..therefore it is up to them..large companies are being replaced by many smaller ones due to necessity to fufill the needs of the people and the resultant market and economy. luckily the future of manufacturing is not going to be completely left in the hands of only a few large companies or the products fueling the market and economy would not meet the needs of the people..it is hard to believe that you are so ignorant and/or stubborn otherwise you would see the light in regards to this emerging 3d technology. believe it or not competition is a good thing and will very quickly raise the quality levels and product selection volumes far faster than just a few large dinosaur companies, not to mention injecting the emerging economy with a much needed influx of hard earned cash to the true creators who will also be the actual workers and the all important buyers.. (<: WOW – it is becoming a good old fashioned economy that works again!! no wonder the dinosaurs died out. they had to for life on this planet to evolve into the human tolerable environments and the human beings we have today! Finally men should most certainly be in charge of The corporations and their machines.. not the other way around as large dinosaur corporations would have it. this emerging 3d technology will help secure that as well. power to the people by and for the people! Not bad…

  3. Massimo Colongo says:

    Hi there,
    Am trying to figure out where i can find the DMLS machine and how much it’s price is.
    can anyone help

Leave a Reply