3D Scanners

New Photos and Details Emerge About Rubicon's Portable 3D Scanner

3d scanner
Comments (14)
  1. Hugues Laliberte says:

    Davide, you forgot about this one: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/681809941/einscan-s-fast-accurate-safe-3d-scanner-for-3d-pri/description
    sub 100 microns precision for less than 1’000 usd.

  2. Tom Bielecki says:

    It’s beautiful!!

  3. Dave Schaller says:

    “Currently the only mid-range offer is Fuel3D’s Scanify” What about Next Engine?

  4. emarugby79 says:

    What is the price range of this Rubicon Portable? when will ti be available?

    1. Robert M. says:

      the price will be about 1500-2000$ and it is expected to be available in May.

  5. Robert M. says:

    emarugby79, the price will be about 1500-2000$ and it is expected to be available in May.

  6. tobycwood says:

    or… use a good dig SLR and Agisoft’s Photoscan in a very potent PC. The results… which may take awhile… are hard to beat.

    1. Robert M. says:

      Yet the result might be far from 200 microns.

  7. emarugby79 says:

    do you think this could be used to scan a statue or a bust in a museum and then reproducing it?

    from the specs it seems that the range and precision would allow for such use but i am not sure how much data it can handle at once

    1. Robert M. says:

      Data is being handled by the PC, not the scanner itself. If the statue is really big, larger then a human, and your PC won’t be able to handle such amount of date, you would be able to either scan it in parts or use a lower resolution.

      1. emarugby79 says:

        thanks for your answer

        what do you mean by handled by the pc? doesn’t this portable device have its own internal (or SD card) portable memory?

        1. Robert M. says:

          Not, at least not the first generations, that is expected in May. It would be using a USB3 cable to connect to a PC. Second gen maybe would have a battery, micro SD card and would connect to a tablet. Having it completely autonomous would be a bad idea, as it would be impossible for the user to understand, which areas of the statue he had already scanned and which ones he didn’t.

          1. emarugby79 says:

            thanks Robert.

            I can imagine a couple ways of keeping track of what you’ve scanned, like a laser pointer (or a line of laser pointers)
            i guess that it is not the tool I thought but still a very very good one.
            any idea of the computer specs?

Leave a Reply